**ABSTRACT NOT FOR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHOR PERMISSION. The title,
authors, and abstract for this completion report are provided below. For a copy of the full completion report,
please contact the author via e-mail at mwagner@msu.edu
or via telephone at 517-353-5485. Questions? Contact the GLFC via email at
frp@glfc.org or via telephone at 734-662-3209.**
DEVELOPMENT OF A PUTREFACTION DERIVED
REPELLENT FOR SEA LAMPREY
C. Michael Wagner1,
Jason D. Bals1, Eric M. Stroud2, and Thomas Luhring1
1 Michigan
State University, Dept. of Fisheries and Wildlife, 480 Wilson Rd., East
Lansing, MI, 48824
2 Shark
Defense, PO Box 2593, Oak Ridge, NJ 07438
May 2015
ABSTRACT:
1. Historical anecdotes
indicated the sea lamprey releases a chemical (alarm cue) after death that
elicits a strong avoidance response (alarm response) in migrants during the annual
reproductive migration. We undertook the first systematic study of this
phenomenon in both laboratory and field environments to describe the response
to the alarm cue and to ascertain its viability as a repellent for use in sea
lamprey control.
2. In the laboratory, migratory
sea lamprey: (a) avoided the odors emitted by both recently killed and 96 h decayed
conspecifics, whether emitted by larvae or adults; and, (b) avoided the odor
from a dead confamilial (silver lamprey) but not a
distantly related fish (bluegill sunfish). Sexual maturation eliminated the
alarm response in females, but not males. Unlike other fishes, the odorant(s)
are distributed throughout the body, though appear concentrated in the skin.
3. In both the laboratory and the
field migrating sea lamprey exhibited a graduated response to a range of odor
concentrations; however, the response increased to full repellency over a
relatively small range of concentrations, suggesting and odor detection induces
full activity vs. a threat-sensitive response.
4. Adult sea lampreys can be
habituated to the odor with 4 h of continuous exposure, though repeated, sporadic
exposure over 6 h does not attenuate the response.
5. Larval sea lampreys detect
and respond to the odor generated by dead adults. In a laboratory test the rate
of downstream drift decreased with increasing water flow and exposure to the
alarm cue, suggesting in inhibits larvae from leaving the sediment.
6. In total, these results
indicate the presence of a putative alarm cue that induces a strong repellent
response over small spatial scales (100 – 101 m) in both laboratory and stream
environments. Our results strongly suggest this repellent may be useful in
manipulating the movements of lampreys in streams to achieve control objectives
(e.g., driving lamprey into the vicinity of a trap).