**ABSTRACT NOT FOR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHOR PERMISSION. The title,
authors, and abstract for this completion report are provided below. For a copy of the full completion report,
please contact the author via e-mail at mwagner@msu.edu
or via telephone at 517-353-5485. Questions? Contact the GLFC via email at
frp@glfc.org or via telephone at 734-662-3209.**
A FIELD INVESTIGATION OF THE
POTENTIAL TO CONTROL SEA LAMPREY THROUGH
PHEROMONE-MEDIATED REDISTRIBUTION OF
MIGRANTS IN THE GREAT LAKES
C.M. Wagner¹, T.D. Meckley¹
¹Michigan
State University
Department
of Fisheries and Wildlife
13 Natural
Resources Building
East
Lansing, MI, 48824
May 2015
ABSTRACT:
1. Two novel control approaches
have been proposed for the use of the sea lamprey migratory pheromone: 1) redistribution
of migrants into areas where they are increasingly vulnerable to capture or
destruction; 2) baiting traps to increase the efficiency of trapping
operations.
2. These strategies are based
on two hypothesized functions for three putative migratory pheromone compounds (PADS,
PSDS, PZS): 1) they attract/retain migrating lampreys
near river mouths; and/or, 2) once in rivers they guide migrants to areas with
suitable larval rearing habitat. Although whole larval odor does induce tributary
selection in the field (Wagner et al. 2006), PADS, PSDS, and PZS are not
responsible for this phenomenon in the river, but could be important at the
river mouth.
3. We carried out three years
of field study to determine how sea lamprey would return to the coast, encounter
rivers in the Great Lakes and to ascertain the functional role of the full
larval odor, as well as to specifically test three larval odor compounds in
attracting and retaining migratory lampreys at river mouths, to develop a full-scale
control strategy for the migratory pheromone at the lake-river interface.
4. The movements of sea lamprey
were captured with fixed acoustic telemetry both on the coast in front of a river,
and offshore, over 3 km from the coast. Before the telemetry data could be used
we had to develop a framework for describing animal behavior from telemetered
observations (Gurarie et al. 2015) and develop a standardized
approach for assessing and filtering the fixed acoustic telemetry known as the
VEMCO Positioning System (VPS) (Meckley et. al.
2014).
5. In 2010, we initiated a
two-year major field experiment designed to record sea lamprey behavior in and
near the Ocqueoc River plume with the VPS system,
under both a low natural larval odor condition (2010), following larval removal
via pesticide (TFM; treated below dam in 2008 and above dam in 2009) and a high
larval odor condition (2011), created from natural larval recruitment and the
addition of PADS, PSDS and PZS daily to bring the concentration of each
synthetic component of larval odor to a 1 x 10 -12 molar concentration in the Ocqueoc River. We monitored the lake conditions adjacent
the river mouth with both an autonomous underwater vehicle (YSI, EcoMapper) and an upward facing aquatic Doppler current
profiler
(ADCP) to monitor a suite of
water quality, bathymetric, and hydrologic parameters necessary to evaluate the
shifting position of the river plume, which was used to develop a dynamic model
of river plume structure. Together these datasets allow for the recreation of
the hydrological experience of individual sea lamprey. Upon reaching a
coastline, sea lampreys move parallel to shore. Encounter with river water
appears to trigger localized search, regardless of larval odor content.
However, when larval odor was abundant, the migrant was more likely to enter
the river. Whether a migrant enters a river, is modulated by the presence of
detectable larval odor, manipulation of river selection by invasive sea lamprey
for management is viable in rivers with high encounter rates.
6. In 2013, three-dimensional
(3-D) paths of migrating female sea lamprey were obtained by an acoustic array with
3 km² of coverage, centered 3.3 km from the coast in Lake Huron. The findings
indicated that sea lamprey sampled an area of lake-bottom to assess absolute
hydrostatic pressure and to select a heading towards reducing pressure
(shallower water).The dataset allowed us to describe how sea lamprey orient to
a coast when in a lake and we hypothesized that sea lamprey navigate to the
nearest coast by (1) orienting to the local bathymetric gradient and (2)
maintaining straight movements counter to the local slope to move towards shallow
water. Together our findings suggest that sea lamprey will only be biased to
return to a particular region if they are attached to a host that gathers in a
particular region of the lake.
7. An annular tank was
insufficient to determine the minimum effective combination of known synthetic components
of larval odor, potentially because larval odor influences habitat selection,
and does not influence movement rate. We have been unable to determine any
effective lab assay to reveal any effect of these compounds on sea lamprey
behavior and field assays have not revealed a definitive effect of the
currently known synthetic replicates of larval odor on habitat selection in the
river or lake.
8. If a sea lamprey encounters
a river plume it becomes eligible for behavioral manipulation by an odor. The addition
of the full larval odor would concentrate sea lamprey in rivers that are
regularly treated or possess poor larval rearing habitat, but a sufficient
imitation of the odor has not yet been identified and synthesized.