**ABSTRACT NOT
FOR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHOR PERMISSION. The title, authors, and abstract
for this completion report are provided below.
For a copy of the full completion report, please contact the author via
e-mail at rick.goetz@noaa.gov or at 360-871-8322.
Questions? Contact the GLFC via email at frp@glfc.org or via telephone at 734-662-3209.**
Morphological, Physiological and
Genetic Differentiation of Lake Trout Morphotypes
from Lake Superior
1NOAA Northwest Fisheries
Science Center
Manchester Research Station
7305 Beach Drive East
Port Orchard, WA 98366
2Marquette Fisheries Research
Station
Michigan Department of
Natural Resources
484 Cherry Creek Rd.
Marquette, MI, 49855
November 2013
ABSTRACT:
Results of
a past study (Goetz et al. 2010: Molecular Ecology 19 Suppl. 1: 176-196) on
lean and siscowet lake trout reared under identical
conditions from conception, indicated that differences in growth and morphometry between lean and siscowet
lake trout have a genetic basis. Using
these cultured lake trout, in the present study we found that siscowet lake trout had higher lipid levels and lower
glycogen levels as compared to lean lake trout in skeletal muscle and
liver. Lean lake trout also had higher
circulating levels of lipids (total lipid, low density, and high density
lipoproteins) and glucose compared to siscowet lake
trout. Analysis of the progeny from
crosses of the cultured morphotypes showed that
progeny of crosses between siscowet females and siscowet males had significantly higher lipid levels than
all other crosses. Further, results of
the reciprocal cross between female siscowets and
lean males indicated that the lipid effect could be associated with the female siscowet. Siscowets had higher levels of the polyunsaturated fatty
acids, eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic
acids, and of myostatin protein and myostatin 1b mRNA.
The combined results indicate that the lake trout morphotypes
differ substantially in the storage of energy that may be related to their
specific life histories. Siscowets store energy
preferentially as lipid and appear to be more efficient in moving lipid from
the blood into the muscle and liver. The
lipid in siscowets may be adaptive for regulating
buoyancy as well as an essential energy reserve for reproduction.
The current study shows that a percentage of
lean (12.2 %) and siscowet (58.0 %) lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) in
populations in southern Lake Superior do not reproduce each year (“skipped
spawning”) even though they have reached puberty. We measured skipped
spawning in lake trout in southern Lake Superior and assessed its impact on
reproduction by developing length- and age-based ogives,
and evaluated the influence of skipped spawning on a key stock assessment
quantity, spawning stock biomass (SSB), by applying maturity and reproduction ogives to simulated populations. Furthermore, we evaluated whether skip
spawning was associated with lower energy reserves by testing for differences
in hepatosomatic index (HSI) according to maturity
status. In populations where skipped
spawning is negligible, a maturity ogive (probability
of being mature) can be considered equivalent to a reproduction ogive (probability of being reproductive). However, in populations where skipped spawning
is present, such as lean and siscowet lake trout in
southern Lake Superior, maturity and reproduction ogives
are very different. Our population
simulations indicate that SSB can be overestimated (8.3 % for leans and 475 %
for siscowets) when skipped spawners
were assumed to be a part of the spawning stock. An inflated reproductive potential of the
population could allow for excessive fishing if quotas are developed based on
these biased SSB estimates. Siscowet lake trout that were skipping spawning had
significantly lower energy reserves (assessed by HSI) than mature and immature
fish. The high incidence of skip
spawning in siscowets may be related to reported slowed somatic growth, high population abundance,
and low prey resources in southern Lake Superior, which supports the hypothesis
that skip spawning is a density-dependent response to limited energy resources.