**ABSTRACT NOT FOR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHOR PERMISSION. The title, authors, and abstract for this completion report are provided below. For a copy of the full completion report, please contact the author via e-mail at jhinderer@glfc.org or via phone at (734) 669-3006. Questions? Contact the GLFC via email at frp@glfc.org or via telephone at 734-662-3209.**
Have water
quality changes in the Huron-Erie Corridor contributed to increases in Lake
Erie sea lamprey populations?
Julia L. Mida Hinderer1,
Jean Adams2, David Bennion3, Aaron Jubar4,
Fraser Neave5, Matthew Faust6, and Michael Siefkes1
1Great Lakes Fishery
Commission, 2100 Commonwealth Blvd., Suite 100, Ann Arbor, MI 48105
2U.S. Geological Survey,
Great Lakes Science Center, 223 East Steinfest Road,
Antigo, WI 54409
3U.S. Geological Survey,
Great Lakes Science Center, 1451 Green Road, Ann Arbor MI 48105
4U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ludington Biological Station, 229 S. Jebavy
Dr., Ludington, MI 49431
5Fisheries and Oceans
Canada, Sea Lamprey Control Centre, 1219 Queen Street East, Sault Ste. Marie,
ON, P6A 2E5
6Ohio Department of
Natural Resources, Sandusky Fisheries Research Station, 305 East Shoreline
Drive, Sandusky, Ohio 44870
July 2016
ABSTRACT:
Invasive sea lamprey
populations are above target in Lake Erie, and a large larval population in the
St. Clair River is hypothesized to contribute to the problem. Historically, the
St. Clair River system was heavily degraded and was not thought to support
problematic sea lamprey populations. However, recent restoration and
remediation efforts have resulted in improved environmental quality in the
river. We examined the relationship between changes in water quality in the St.
Clair River and larval sea lamprey populations, using existing monitoring data
from multiple agencies to analyze trends in dissolved oxygen (DO) and
temperature (T) at locations near standard sea lamprey survey sites. Our
inability to combine data across agencies limited the spatial and temporal
coverage of our water quality data. We did not detect trends in DO or T through
time. We also plotted the frequency of extreme events (i.e., high T and low DO)
at point source discharges through time. Interestingly, the frequency of these
extreme events increased in recent years at several stations, but we were
unable to detect long-term trends in the data. We examined trends in Secchi depths in the system through time and did not find
clear patterns. Finally, we created Geographic Information System (GIS) layers
of habitat restoration sites, sediment remediation areas, former combined sewer
overflow (CSO) sites, and former industrial point source pollution discharges.
We overlaid these “areas of remediation” with statistically significant larval
sea lamprey hot spots (i.e., areas with elevated densities of larval sea
lamprey), and although two hotspots were associated with former CSOs or
industrial point sources near tributary outflows, we did not find any overall
patterns of spatial correlation that would suggest a causal relationship. There
was a consistent pattern throughout the time series of within-year hot spots of
larvae in the lower St. Clair River just upstream of Harsens and Walpole
Islands, and a high outlier site on the upstream end of Stag Island. Sea
lamprey surveys could be conducted near the outflows of formerly polluted
tributaries in systems of interest, as these were the only areas that appeared spatially
correlated with sea lamprey hotspots in this study. We conclude that although
our data do not allow us to say that improved water quality or habitat
restoration has led to increases in larval sea lampreys in the St. Clair River,
other formerly polluted river systems might produce more sea lampreys as they
are restored. Agencies must institute consistent, well-designed water quality
monitoring to understand how sea lampreys and other undesirable species might
respond to changing conditions.