**ABSTRACT NOT FOR CITATION WITHOUT AUTHOR PERMISSION. The title, authors, and abstract for this completion report are provided below. For a copy of the full completion report, please contact the author via e-mail at lgr1@cornell.edu. Questions? Contact the GLFC via email at frp@glfc.org or via telephone at 734-662-3209.**
The vertical connection: restructuring of
Lake Ontario’s offshore
Rudstam L.1, B. Weidel2,
J. Watkins1
1Department
of Natural Resources and Cornell University Biological Field Station,
Bridgeport, NY
2USGS
Great Lakes Science Center, Lake Ontario Biological Station,
Oswego, NY
March 2016
ABSTRACT:
Production
in the offshore waters in Lake Ontario may be augmented by production in a deep
chlorophyll layer (DCL) that forms in clear, oligotrophic lakes and is a
prominent feature of Lakes Michigan, Huron and Superior. The importance of this
layer in Lake Ontario has likely increased due to increased water clarity
coupled with ongoing oligotrophication of the
offshore. This project studied the importance of the DCL in Lake Ontario during
the intensive field year (CSMI) in 2013 by complementing the standard 2013
sampling with more detailed analysis of the DCL including the extent the DCL is
used by zooplankton, mysids and fish. Diatoms were the most common algae in the
DCL and were productive, as documented by oxygen maxima in vertical profiles.
Free water oxygen probes were deployed and the results are suggestive of
production in the DCL, although results are not clear cut. The spatial extent
of the DCL was correlated with thermocline depth and water transparency and the
feature was therefore more prevalent in the western part of Lake Ontario where
the thermocline is shallower. The DCL dissipated earlier in the eastern part of
the lake both because of the deeper thermocline and due to a whiting event that
decreased water transparency. Zooplankton (cyclopoid copepods and cladocerans)
concentrated in the DCL during the day and migrated into the epilimnion at night. The large calanoid copepod Limnocalanus macrurus migrated
from the hypolimnion to the DCL at night. We were not able to measure the
degree of use of the DCL by zooplankton with stable isotopes or fatty acid
signatures, because there was no difference between deep and shallow signatures
of phytoplankton in 2013. Mysids migrated into the DCL and small mysids
consumed phytoplankton during July, less so in September. Mysids of all sizes
consumed diatoms in May although the DCL was not yet fully formed. Alewife formed
schools in the upper regions of the DCL and its zooplankton concentrations
during the day. These schools broke up at dusk and most fish migrated up
towards the surface following their migrating zooplankton prey. Some alewife
remained close to the thermocline presumably to feed on Limnocalanus
and Mysis leading to a two layered distribution of alewife in the lake at
night. Bioenergetics models of alewife compared to cisco show a growth advantage
for cisco in the DCL and a growth advantage for alewife in the epilimnion in the summer of 2013. This vertical division of
highest growth potential could lead to coexistence of alewife and cisco, similar
to the situation with bloater and alewife in Lake Michigan. However, other
factors, such as alewife predation on larval ciscoes, may limit coregonid
populations in Lake Ontario.